I’ve talked previously (right here and right here) concerning the idea of whether or not there’s a level past which train turns into an excessive amount of of factor. Since I’m at all times tempted to push the envelope on this, I made a decision to ask Google Gemini deep analysis to analyze it for me: Endurance Train Quantity, Depth and Human Longevity. It got here up with this report, which is summarized in this podcast derived from the report. It’s an fascinating replace. Previously some research have appeared to point out a “U-shaped curve” of longevity vs train quantity: Train reduces all-cause mortality, with the profit growing with extra train, up to a degree. After that, mortality threat will increase once more. This isn’t born out in meta-analyses of the vast majority of research, nevertheless. As a substitute, all-cause mortality continues to go down irrespective of how a lot you train. However past a sure level, we’re at larger threat of growing sure cardiac abnormalities like Afib or scarring of the guts. This appears to be extra seemingly for these doing a whole lot of excessive depth coaching.
So in case you’re like me and revel in a number of endurance coaching, it’s a good suggestion to comply with a system like polarized coaching the place most of your coaching is at simple depth, with a minority of exercises at larger depth. Different suggestions are additionally given in the report like probably present process cardiac screening to reduce the chance of cardiac abnormalities. As a result of I had a heart-valve alternative previously I’m below the continued care of a heart specialist, and am glad to get periodically screened.






