Washington first state to ban formaldehyde-releasing chemical substances in cosmetics

Washington first state to ban formaldehyde-releasing chemical substances in cosmetics


Key Factors for Producers and Suppliers

  • Scope: Applies to all deliberately added formaldehyde-releasing chemical substances, not simply the 25 listed substances.
  • Timeline: Efficient January 1, 2027, with sell-through permitted till December 31, 2027.
  • Enforcement: Detected formaldehyde will likely be presumed deliberately added.
  • Compliance Assist: The Washington Division of Ecology will present technical steerage, together with a webinar scheduled for October 1, 2025.
  • Market Context: Giant retailers are already demonstrating possible reformulation pathways.

Washington has develop into the primary state within the U.S. to formally undertake a complete ban on 25 formaldehyde-releasing chemical substances in beauty merchandise, based on an August 28 announcement by the state Division of Ecology.

The brand new rule applies to the listed substances within the chart contained on this article, and another deliberately added formaldehyde releasers utilized in merchandise manufactured, offered, or distributed within the state. Its adoption was pushed by a rising demand to guard public well being pursuits.

Formaldehyde and its releasers are “generally used to increase the shelf lifetime of a product—however formaldehyde can also be a recognized carcinogen,” the Washington Division of Ecology mentioned. Publicity can happen via repeated use of shampoos, eyelash glues, nail polishes, and hair remedies.

Compliance timeline and enforcement

The restrictions take impact January 1, 2027, and retailers may have till December 31, 2027, to promote via current stock. The Washington Division of Ecology said the rule “clarifies the definition of ‘deliberately added,’ proscribing all different formaldehyde-releasing chemical substances” along with the next listed substances.

Chemical Identify Chemical Abstracts Service
Registration Quantity (CAS RN)
DMDM Hydantoin 6440-58-0
Diazolidinyl Urea 78491-02-8
Imidazolidinyl Urea 39236-46-9
Quaternium-15 4080-31-3; 51229-78-8 5
Tosylamide/Formaldehyde Resin (PTSAF) 25035-71-6
2-Bromo-2-Nitropropane-1,3-Diol (Bronopol) 52-51-7
Sodium Hydroxymethylglycinate 70161-44-3
Polyoxymethylene Urea 9011-05-6; 68611-64-3
Polyoxymethylene Melamine 9003-08-1
5-Bromo-5-Nitro-1,3-Dioxane (Bronidox) 30007-47-7
7-Ethylbicyclo-oxazolidine (Bioban CS1246) 7747-35-5
Benzylhemiformal 14548-60-8
Dimethylhydantoin formaldehyde (DMHF) 26811-08-5; 9065-13-8
Dimethylol Glycol 3586-55-8
Dimethylol Urea 140-95-4
Dimethyl Oxazolidine 51200-87-4
MDM Hydantoin 116-25-6; 27636-82-4; 16228-00-5
Methenamine 100-97-0
Methylal 109-87-5
Paraformaldehyde 30525-89-4
Polyoxymethylene 9002-81-7
Tetramethylolglycoluril 5395-50-6
Timonacic (when utilized in heat-activated hair straighteners) 444-27-9
Tris-Hydroxymethylnitromethane 126-11-4
Urea, polymer with formaldehyde, isobutylated 68002-18-6

To strengthen accountability, the rule presumes that any detected formaldehyde was deliberately added, requiring firms to confirm the security of their components all through their provide chains, the Division’s press assertion confirmed.

Implementation and help

The rule builds on Washington’s Poisonous-Free Cosmetics Act, adopted in Could 2023, which banned formaldehyde itself starting January 2025. The Washington Division of Ecology mentioned the regulation offers it “the authority to determine and prohibit formaldehyde-releasing chemical substances via rulemaking.”

To help the trade, the Division will host a compliance webinar on October 1, 2025, to elucidate restrictions, sell-through provisions, and out there technical assets. “We’re dedicated to supporting a clean transition for all members of the cosmetics provide chain,” mentioned Shari Franjevic, who leads the Division’s implementation of the regulation, within the Division’s press assertion.

She added that the Division will work with producers, distributors, retailers, and cosmetics professionals to “assist them perceive the regulation and rule and meet the brand new necessities.”

Well being issues are driving the rule

Formaldehyde is assessed as a human carcinogen and linked to leukemia, respiratory illness, and pores and skin irritation. The Washington Division of Ecology’s testing in 2023 discovered elevated ranges in lotions, lotions, and hair merchandise, together with these marketed to girls of colour.

The company highlighted salon employees as significantly weak on account of their day by day publicity within the office.

“There are cosmetics merchandise in the marketplace that do the identical job with out releasing these cancer-causing chemical substances,” Franjevic mentioned within the press assertion, noting that safer substitutes are already in use.

Advocacy and knowledgeable response

Advocacy teams and public well being researchers welcomed the transfer. Poisonous-Free Future mentioned Washington was “main the way in which by banning these cancer-causing chemical substances in merchandise like pores and skin cream, hair styling gels, and eye lash glue,” within the group’s press launch.

Director of presidency and market coverage Cheri Peele added in the identical assertion that “safer options can be found, and we count on this landmark motion to immediate the reformulation of merchandise offered all through the US.”

Talking to Poisonous Free Future, cosmetologist Brandi Hyatt known as the brand new restrictions “a giant step ahead in defending individuals’s well being and security,” whereas Columbia College environmental well being scientist Dr. Ami Zota described the ban as “a victory for science, well being, and justice,” significantly for girls of colour and salon employees who face increased exposures.

Market implications

The retail sector has already begun adjusting to client and regulatory stress. As famous by Poisonous-Free Future, the group’s 2024 Retailer Report Card discovered that firms, together with Sephora, Goal, and Ulta Magnificence, had restricted formaldehyde releasers in private-label merchandise and elevated their choices of safer alternate options.

Mae Kennedy of WE ACT for Environmental Justice advised Poisonous-Free Future that the ban “will give all shoppers entry to safer cosmetics whereas additionally addressing the poor well being outcomes confronted particularly by Black girls because of racist, Eurocentric magnificence requirements that encourage chemical hair straightening.”

0
YOUR CART
  • No products in the cart.